Surjit Lidder | Melbourne, VIC | Bright, VIC | Albury, NSW | Hip & Knee Specialist | 03 9110 0019
Hip replacement surgery is one of the most successful procedures in modern orthopaedics. Patients considering surgery often ask whether an hip replacement is better through an anterior approach compared to a posterior approach.
At Lidder Orthopaedics, patients from Melbourne, Albury-Wodonga, Bright, Myrtleford and surrounding regional communities are assessed individually to determine the most appropriate surgical approach for their specific circumstances.
Estimated reading time: 7 minutes
Last reviewed: June 2026
Written by: © Mr Surjit Lidder – Orthopaedic Surgeon
✔ What causes hip arthritis?
✔ What is the anterior approach?
✔ What is the posterior approach?
✔ When should you seek specialist advice?
✔ Treatment options
✔ Frequently asked questions
Hip replacement surgery involves removing damaged arthritic joint surfaces and replacing them with artificial implants designed to restore function and relieve pain.
The goal is to:
Reduce pain
Improve mobility
Restore quality of life
Allow return to recreational activities
The difference between approaches relates primarily to how the surgeon accesses the hip joint.
Hip replacement is commonly considered for patients with:
Osteoarthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis
Avascular necrosis
Hip dysplasia
Post-traumatic arthritis
Patients are often active retirees who enjoy golf, hiking, cycling and skiing throughout Melbourne and Alpine Victoria.
Groin pain
Hip stiffness
Difficulty walking
Night pain
Difficulty putting on shoes and socks
Reduced exercise tolerance
Pain getting in and out of a car
The anterior approach accesses the hip joint through the front of the hip.
Potential advantages may include:
Less muscle disruption
Earlier recovery of mobility
Smaller incision location
Reduced post-operative precautions in selected patients
However, not every patient is a suitable candidate.
Traditional approaches include posterior and lateral approaches to the hip. These techniques have been successfully used for many decades and remain excellent options for many patients.
Potential advantages include:
Excellent implant positioning
Versatility in complex cases
Familiarity in revision surgery
Proven long-term outcomes
Consider assessment if:
Hip pain limits walking
Sleep is disturbed
Physiotherapy no longer provides relief
Daily activities become difficult
Arthritis affects quality of life
Treatment Options
Physiotherapy
Weight management
Anti-inflammatory medication
Activity modification
Walking aids
Cortisone injections
Hip replacement surgery may be recommended when conservative measures fail.
The most appropriate surgical approach is determined by:
Patient anatomy
Body habitus
Severity of arthritis
Previous surgery
Surgeon assessment
Mr Surjit Lidder specialises in hip replacement surgery and helps patients understand the benefits and limitations of different surgical approaches. Patients from Melbourne, Bright, Myrtleford and Albury-Wodonga receive personalised recommendations based on their individual goals and anatomy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Some patients experience earlier recovery, although pain management and outcomes vary between individuals.
No. Suitability depends on anatomy, body habitus and underlying pathology.
Long-term implant survival is primarily related to implant positioning and patient factors rather than skin incision location.
Most patients can return to golf following appropriate rehabilitation.
The best approach is the one most appropriate for the individual patient after specialist assessment.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and should not replace personalised advice from your orthopaedic surgeon, GP or physiotherapist. Recovery timelines vary between individuals, and return to sport should always be tailored to your specific circumstances.
Related Articles
Tel: (03) 9110 0019
Fax: (03) 9110 0022
After Hours: (03) 9387 1000
Email: reception@lidderorthopaedics.com
HealthLink: drlidder